England Football Online
 Home  New Team Matches
Seasons Competition  Opponents Comment
Features Q & A Forum Appendices
Contact Us Page Last Updated 31 December 2001

 

World Cup Index
Preliminary Competition

Final Tournament
Team Records
Squad Records

Final Draw Team Ranking
Comment - Ranking the Groups
Group F Discipline Table
Preparation Matches

England in World Cup 2002
FIFA's Final Draw Team Ranking

  World Cup 2002 Final Tournament
31 May to 30 June in Japan and Korea 

FIFA World Cup 2002 Organising Committee's Final Draw Team Ranking
    WC 1990 WC 1994 WC 1998 WC Pts Rank
Dec 1999
Rank
Dec 2000
Rank
Nov 2001
Rank Pts All Pts
  Team Rk Pts 1x Rk Pts 2x Rk Pts 3x Tot Av Rk Pts Rk Pts Rk Pts Tot Av Tot
1 Brazil 9 24 24 1 32 64 2 31 93 181 30 1 32 1 32 3 30 94 31 61
2 Argentina 2 31 31 10 23 46 6 27 81 158 26 6 28 3 30 2 31 89 30 56
3 Italy 3 30 30 2 31 62 5 28 84 176 29 14 23 4 29 6 28 80 27 56
4 Germany 1 32 32 5 28 56 7 26 78 166 28 5 29 11 25 11 24 78 26 54
5 France nq 0 0 nq 0 0 1 32 96 96 16 3 31 2 31 1 32 94 31 47
6 Spain 10 23 23 8 25 50 17 9 27 100 17 4 30 7 27 7 27 84 28 45
7 Mexico nq 0 0 13 20 40 13 20 60 100 17 10 26 12 24 9 26 76 25 42
8 England 4 29 29 nq 0 0 9 24 72 101 17 12 24 17 22 10 25 71 24 41
    WC 1990 WC 1994 WC 1998 WC Pts Rank
Dec 1999
Rank
Dec 2000
Rank
Nov 2001
Rank Pts All Pts
  Team Rk Pts 1x Rk Pts 2x Rk Pts 3x Tot Av Rk Pts Rk Pts Rk Pts Tot Av Tot
9 Croatia nq 0 0 nq 0 0 3 30 90 90 15 9 27 18 21 19 19 67 22 37
10 Denmark nq 0 0 nq 0 0 8 25 75 75 13 11 25 22 17.5 17 21 64 21 34
11 Paraguay nq 0 0 nq 0 0 14 19 57 57 10 17 20 9 26 14 23 69 23 33
12 U.S.A. 23 8 8 14 19 38 32 8 24 70 12 22 18 16 23 20 17.5 59 20 32
13 Sweden 21 8 8 3 30 60 nq 0 0 68 11 16 21 22 17.5 16 22 61 20 31
14 Belgium 11 22 22 11 22 44 19 9 27 93 16 33 13 27 15 20 17.5 46 15 31
15 Portugal nq 0 0 nq 0 0 nq 0 0 0 0 15 22 6 28 4 29 79 26 26
16 Rep. Ireland 8 25 25 16 17 34 nq 0 0 59 10 35 12 31 13 18 20 45 15 25
    WC 1990 WC 1994 WC 1998 WC Pts Rank
Dec 1999
Rank
Dec 2000
Rank
Nov 2001
Rank Pts All Pts
  Team Rk Pts 1x Rk Pts 2x Rk Pts 3x Tot Av Rk Pts Rk Pts Rk Pts Tot Av Tot
17 Russia 17 9 9 18 9 18 nq 0 0 27 5 18 19 21 19 22 16 54 18 23
18 Nigeria nq 0 0 9 24 48 12 21 63 111 19 76 3 52 5 40 4 12 4 23
19 Saudi Arabia nq 0 0 12 21 42 28 8 24 66 11 38 11 36 10 30 11 32 11 22
20 South Africa nq 0 0 nq 0 0 24 9 27 27 5 30 16 20 20 34 8 44 15 20
21 Tunisia nq 0 0 nq 0 0 26 8 24 24 4 31 15 26 16 28 12 43 14 18
22 Cameroon 7 26 26 22 8 16 25 8 24 66 11 58 6 39 8 38 5 19 6 17
23 Turkey nq 0 0 nq 0 0 nq 0 0 0 0 29 17 30 14 23 15 46 15 15
24 Uruguay 16 17 17 nq 0 0 nq 0 0 17 3 45 9 32 12 24 14 35 12 15
    WC 1990 WC 1994 WC 1998 WC Pts Rank
Dec 1999
Rank
Dec 2000
Rank
Nov 2001
Rank Pts All Pts
  Team Rk Pts 1x Rk Pts 2x Rk Pts 3x Tot Av Rk Pts Rk Pts Rk Pts Tot Av Tot
25 Korea Rep. 22 8 8 20 9 18 30 8 24 50 8 51 8 40 7 43 3 18 6 14
26 Japan nq 0 0 nq 0 0 31 8 24 24 4 57 7 38 9 35 7 23 8 12
27 Slovenia nq 0 0 nq 0 0 nq 0 0 0 0 40 10 35 11 27 13 34 11 11
28 Poland nq 0 0 nq 0 0 nq 0 0 0 0 32 14 43 6 33 9 29 10 10
29 Costa Rica 13 20 20 nq 0 0 nq 0 0 20 3 64 5 60 3 31 10 18 6 9
30 Ecuador nq 0 0 nq 0 0 nq 0 0 0 0 65 4 53 4 37 6 14 5 5
31 China nq 0 0 nq 0 0 nq 0 0 0 0 88 1 74 2 55 2 5 2 2
32 Senegal nq 0 0 nq 0 0 nq 0 0 0 0 79 2 88 1 67 1 4 1 1

Notes

FIFA's World Cup 2002 Organising Committee adopted a complex formula to rank the 32 qualifying teams for purpose of seeding for the final draw.  Regrettably, the Committee used the ranking only to choose the five top-seeded teams that joined reigning champion France and host nations South Korea and Japan atop the eight first round groups.  It did not use the ranking to assign the remaining teams to the pots used in the final draw, but, instead made those assignments on the basis of confederation affiliation.

The teams were ranked on both their previous World Cup performances and their standing in FIFA's world rankings of national teams, and equal weight was given to these two measures in calculating the ranking.

The Committee examined the 32 qualifying teams' performances in the last three World Cup final tournaments, those of 1990, 1994 and 1998.  First place in one of those final tournaments earned 32 points, second place 31 points, third 30 points and so on down to 16th place, which earned 17 points.  Teams eliminated at the group phase of those tournaments received either 9 points (for 17th through 20th at the 1990 and 1994 tournaments and 17th through 24th at the 1998 tournament) or 8 points (for 21st through 24th at the earlier two tournaments and for 25th through 32nd at the 1998 tournament).  

The Committee decided the more recent the tournament, the more weight it deserved, and so it scaled the points earned at the three tournaments to give them a 3:2:1 ratio.  Points given for the 1998 tournament were multiplied by 3, points awarded for the 1994 tournament by 2 and points awarded for the 1990 tournament by 1.  The resulting numbers were added and the total was divided by 6 (the total of the multipliers) to give a World Cup final tournament points average.

For example, England finished 4th at the 1990 tournament and earned 29 points, which was given a multiplier of 1, resulting in a 1990 total of 29 points.  England did not qualify for the 1994 tournament and so earned 0 points, which was given a multiplier of 2, producing a 1994 total of 0 points.  England finished 9th at the 1998 tournament, earning 24 points, which was given a multiplier of 3, producing a 1998 total of 72 points.  The points for the three tournaments were added together, producing a total of 101 World Cup points (29+0+72=101).  That total was divided by 6, producing a World Cup final tournament points average of 17 for England.

The Committee also examined the 32 qualifying teams' standings in FIFA's national team rankings for the past three years.  In particular, it looked at the December end-of-year rankings for 1999 and 2000 and the latest available ranking for 2001, which was November's.  The team with the highest ranking among the 32 qualifying teams was awarded 32 points, the team with the second highest ranking was awarded 31, and so on, down to the team with the 32nd highest ranking (the lowest among the 32 qualifying teams), which was given 1 point.  The points earned for each ranking were given equal weight and so no multipliers were involved in this calculation.   The points earned for all three ranking periods were added together, and the resulting total was divided by 3 to give a world rankings points average.

For example, England were 12th in the December, 1999 ranking, and since that was the 9th highest ranking among the 32 teams qualifying for the World Cup 2002 final tournament, England were awarded 24 points.  England were 17th in the December, 2000 ranking, and because that was the 11th highest ranking among the 32 World Cup 2002 teams, 22 points were awarded.  England were 10th in the November, 2001 ranking, which was the 8th highest ranking among the 32 teams, earning 25 points.  The points for the three rankings were added together, producing a total of 71 world rankings points (24+22+25=71).  That total was divided by 3, producing a world rankings points average of 24 for England.

The Committee added together each team's World Cup final tournament points average and world rankings points average, producing a combined total, which was used to rank the teams.

For example, England had a World Cup points average of 17 and a world rankings points average of 24, which produced a combined total of 41.  That total was the 8th highest among the 32 teams qualifying for the World Cup 2002 tournament.

We have not checked the FIFA entries for accuracy, but a few errors were apparent on the face of the ranking table FIFA published.  It gave Belgium no credit for their 19th place finish at World Cup 1998, thus depriving them of five points in the combined point totals, and we have adjusted Belgium's total points from 26 to 31.  The FIFA table also erred in adding the World Cup points average and the world ranking points average for a few teams.  Brazil\s combined points total is 62, not 61, as FIFA had it, the U.S.A.'s is 32, not 31, Sweden's is 31, not 32, and South Africa's is 20, not 19.  As a result of these corrections, Belgium ranks 14th, not 15th, and Portugal 15th, not 14th, the U.S.A. occupies 12th place, not 13th, and Sweden lies 13th, not 12th.  

___________________

PY